Brokeness? [googleresearch.blogspot.com]
Well? "Static types give me the same feeling of safety as the announcement that my seat cushion can be used as a floatation device. (Don Roberts)" [ http://blogs.23.nu/c0re/stories/10438/ ]
Smalltalk and Lisp solved this twenty, thirty, forty years ago or so. And there are other answers for statically typed langauges too: http://www.cincomsmalltalk.com/blog/blogView?showComments=true&entry=3327901832 Patrick Logan mentions is has to do with poorly defined integers and lack of overflow handling, and you can design a dynamic language the same way.
11:02 AM, 16 Jun 2006 by dave bauer Permalink | Comments (0)
| June 2006 | ||||||
| S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
| 1 | 2 | 3 | ||||
| 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
| 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 |
| 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 |
| 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | |