01:47 PM, 21 May 2003 by dave bauer Permalink | Comments (0)
10:19 AM, 21 May 2003 by dave bauer Permalink | Comments (0)
So in this case the company is just protecting its interests. Mark links to a list of similar pages, and several do use the same term. I don't see how that justifies Marks misuse of a trademark though. The company does not (at least in the letter Mark posted) say that he is not allowed to provide the service, just not use their trademark to describe it.
03:04 PM, 01 May 2003 by dave bauer Permalink | Comments (0)
| May 2003 | ||||||
| S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
| 1 | 2 | 3 | ||||
| 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
| 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 |
| 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 |
| 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 |